search-loading

IT'S A FAN COIL JIM -
BUT NOT AS WE KNOW IT


FCU Air Flow Monitoring

IT'S A FAN COIL JIM - BUT NOT AS WE KNOW IT

10/12/2008

FCU Air flow monitoring

The building regulations are revised every 4 years and Barry Trewhitt, TROX Product Manager, explains the impact of successive reductions  in carbon emissions and how this could totally change fan coil systems.

Part L 2006 sets a target of 28% reduction in carbon emissions from the base in Part L 2002.  But we all know it doesn’t stop there, in fact industry representatives are confirming the new 2010 Part L will target a further 25% reduction in carbon emissions with a view to getting commercial buildings carbon neutral by 2019.

A further important issue is the transparency that will exist initially in the calculated energy consumption of a building.  Combine these two issues and you have a significant market driver for the property developer to ensure his buildings are utilising the most energy efficient systems that are currently available and not necessarily those that just comply with the existing building regulations.

The transparency created by display energy certificates (DECs) will lead to a better informed tenant who can compare the energy performance of buildings that he may be considering renting.

When looking for energy savings sometimes the obvious targets can be overlooked as in the case of fan coils which run at 100% full speed irrespective of whether they are heating, cooling, or, as is generally the case, recirculating room air mixed with fresh air.

In diagram 1 the control sequence is represented for a constant volume fan coil.  The water valves for heating or cooling are adjusted according to room temperature but the fan is allowed to run at full speed all of the time, an obvious needless waste of energy.   A few years ago maybe we wouldn’t switch the lights off when we left the office but I feel sure more effort is made now to control lighting and if you see an empty office with all the lights on you now realise this is an unnecessary waste of energy.  This is the same with constant speed, constant volume fan coils.

Since the motor power consumption follows a cube relationship to fan speed and air volume a small reduction in speed gives a big reduction in energy consumed as show in the simple table below:-

 

Air Volume

(fan speed)

Motor Power

 

100%

100%

80%

51.2%

60%

21.6%

So varying the fan speed with a VAV fan coil  gives significant savings in motor power consumption.  The control sequence for a VAV fan coil unit is illustrated in Diagram 2 and shows that as the heating or cooling is reduced so the air volume is reduced proportionally and at the same time.  A limit of 60% of rated air volume will generally avoid “dumping” but selections of diffusers should be checked by air distribution engineers.  The trend is now to make the fan coil a complete package with the diffusers and ductwork design giving the benefit of single point responsibility.  There are antidumping devices on the market, such as the TROX Varyset,  a simple but clever device in the form of a segmented plenum and air operated diverter flap which allow the air volume to be turned down to 25% without dumping.

By using VAV fan coils you can save something like 3.5W/m² and that could represent as much as a 10% saving on emissions from the building.

With regard to running cost only a small speed reduction of 20 per cent can cut in half the energy consumption from the fan motor. On a building of, say, 10,000m² with 400 fan coils this could equate to an energy saving of £15,000 to £20,000 per annum.

Test work in a dedicated BSRIA approved fan coil test cell was undertaken by TROX at its R & D centre in Thetford and the results are summarised in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 1 – VAV Fan Coils Design Parameters

Cooling ~ 100 W/m2 Perimeter Zone

1 Fan Coil / 25m2

Air flow ~ 10-12 l/s / m2

CAV Fan Coil Motor 4 – 5 W/m2

In a typical zone the cooling load percentage against the time run in a year has been worked out as follows:-

 

% of load                     Hours/Year

 

    100                              475

      80                              385

      60                            2000

The results are summarised in Table 2 as follows:-

Energy Consumption

 

Overall running for one fan coil for a year

 

Fan Type

kVAh

Kg CO2*

 

Cost

(£) **

Motor Consumption

W/m2

AC CAV

447

166

26.37

4.5

ECVAV

149

46

8.79

1.11

MOTOR WATT CONSUMPTION REDUCED TO ¼

 

*   Based on 0.43 kg CO2/kWh

 

**  Based on 5.9p kVAh

As can be seen the reduction in motor energy went from 4.5W/m2 down to 1.11W/m2, a significant and worthwhile saving in energy and carbon emissions reduced by a factor of 4 to 1.

So using VAV fan coils gives a readily available saving in carbon emissions.  Something I’m sure that will become standard practice throughout the industry very soon.     

Download article (doc)      

Download picture

Download diagram 1

Download diagram 2

 

Contact

Thetford Main Offices Small

TROX UK Ltd

Caxton Way, Thetford
Norfolk IP24 3SQ
Tel: +44 (0)1842 754545